The Comedy of Errors That Was the First-Ever Space Walk
Mar. 18th, 2026 09:00 pmMurphy’s Law was in full effect
The post The Comedy of Errors That Was the First-Ever Space Walk appeared first on Nautilus.
Murphy’s Law was in full effect
The post The Comedy of Errors That Was the First-Ever Space Walk appeared first on Nautilus.
I was excited to discover that the Centre for Expanded Poetics has an Archive section that presents the complete runs of Caterpillar (1967-1973), Sulfur (1981-2000), and transition (1927-1938). I don’t remember being aware of the first (which you can read about here: “Caterpillar was started by Clayton Eshleman as a series of chapbooks by such writers as Jackson Mac Low, David Antin, Paul Blackburn, and Louis Zukofsky”), but the other two are very familiar; I was excited when Sulfur first came out (I’ve probably got the first few issues kicking around somewhere), and of course transition is known to every aficionado of English-language modernism. What a gift to the online world!
For those who don’t care about defunct little magazines, try sengi, which is really two different words, one meaning ‘elephant shrew’ (from Swahili sengi, probably from another Bantu language) and the other the name of a former monetary unit of Zaire, one hundredth of a likuta and one ten-thousandth of a zaire — you might think it was named after the little mammal, but no, it’s from Kongo sengi, senki, from French cinq (in the sense of five sous). The second is in the OED but not, so far, the first.
An interview with a music cognition researcher about the evolutionary roots of music
The post Did Music Give Rise to Language? appeared first on Nautilus.
A reader writes:
I manage two departments, each led by a supervisor — one a married man and the other a single woman. While I work in a separate building, I’ve received numerous reports from my boss, peers, and direct reports regarding their behavior.
They are inseparable: taking all breaks together, sharing a single desk, whispering closely, and staying late whenever the other does. The optics have become a significant distraction. Seven different people — including those outside our organization — have commented on the inappropriateness of their closeness, with some making “get a room” jokes.
While their deliverables aren’t egregiously late, I often experience delays in email responses or project updates. During these gaps, team members frequently message me to report the duo is “goofing off” or whispering in the break room instead of working.
Since I haven’t personally witnessed the behavior and their performance hasn’t hit a “failing” grade yet, I am unsure how to proceed. Should I address the optics and the professional reputation of the departments? Should I wait for a specific performance failure? Or should I ignore it since the evidence is technically hearsay?
You’re not a court of law; you get to be concerned by hearsay!
There are lots of situations that can come up as a manager where you’ll hear something alarming that you haven’t observed firsthand, and in most of those cases the answer can’t be to do nothing since you didn’t witness it yourself.
Depending on the circumstances, sometimes you can arrange things so you’ll have more opportunity to observe the problem yourself. But other times you won’t be able to (or it will be concerning enough that you need to act more quickly than that would allow). In those cases, the right next step is to talk to the people involved and ask about what’s getting reported to you.
In this case, I’d recommend a combination of those two approaches. First, can you find a way to observe some of this yourself? You normally work in another building, but can you find reasons to be at the other location more often? When you get messages that these two are goofing off while you’re waiting on overdue work from them, can you just go over there and see it firsthand? That will arm you with some ability to cite what you’ve seen yourself.
But if you couldn’t do that — if you worked across the country from them, for example — you could still address this. The way to do that is to talk to them individually and say something like, “If I’d only heard this from one or two people, I wouldn’t bring it up, but I’ve heard it from numerous people at various levels now, so it’s something we need to address. I’m hearing from multiple people that you and Sidney are spending so much time together than it’s become a distraction in the office — including things like sharing a single desk, whispering, and hanging out in the break room together while work is getting delayed. I know I personally have been waiting on responses from you, only to hear that the two of you are socializing in a different part of the building. It’s of course fine to be close to a colleague, but I’m hearing that the optics have become enough of a distraction that unless you’re mystified about what this could be referring to, I need you both to have more professional distance while you’re at work.”
Whether or not they’re having an affair is their business, but their behavior at work is yours and that’s the part you can speak to.
The post people are gossiping about how close 2 supervisors I manage are appeared first on Ask a Manager.
Stopping GLP-1 treatments has side effects, too
The post “Whiplash”: Heart Attack and Stroke Risk Jumps When People Stop Taking GLP-1s appeared first on Nautilus.
A reader writes:
I manage an employee who, to put it frankly, has a bad attitude. Negative about everything: our job, our clients, life in general. A constant rain cloud. He brings down morale quite a bit, and other employees have made comments to me about how hard it is to work with him.
Where I struggle is that I have a lot of sympathy for him and the many health problems he has been facing the last few years. He was in a car accident that he sustained pretty big injuries from, was diagnosed with a chronic disease which causes him constant pain, and also has had to deal with the sudden loss of a sibling. I feel like I would kind of hate the world, too. How do I address this without adding yet another blow to his mood?
I answer this question — and two others — over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here.
Other questions I’m answering there today include:
The post my employee has a terrible attitude … for a good reason appeared first on Ask a Manager.
"Okay, you wanted a snack and found an easy target in an asshole that robs junkies, but you didn't leave me there."
"It was a poor way to die."
Daniel blinks, then blinks again. Nothing since he had woken up in this motel room had been what he was expecting, but this somehow was the most off-putting thing the monster had said so far. "You care about how I die?"
"You are not so special that you are the factor that matters. Death is my domain, and I have standards to the execution of it."
A laugh escapes from Daniel, high-pitched with hysteria. "You took me out of the gutter, bought a swanky motel room, and washed my clothes while I was passed out on the bed, because you thought I was dying wrong ?"
or
5 + 1 ways Armand disapproved of how Daniel found himself on the brink of death, and had to Dom Daniel back to himself.
What I read
Finished Victoria's Secret - still slightly meh about it - could possibly have engaged a bit with a longer history of 'Monarch has favourite/s who are not Quite Our Sort', even if historically the gender issues in play here were different??? Also had a bit of feeling that QV was not entirely NOT treating John Brown in the light of A Very Large Faithful Dog devoted to her to which she was also devoted and which she insisted on imposing upon people who hated dogs.... Thought it was good on her awful childhood, though.
Clare Pollard, The Modern Fairies (2024) - telling stories about women telling stories, i.e. the precieuses at the time of Louis XIV, the stories they were telling and their stories and how those reflected one another.
Susan Ertz, Woman Alive (1935), my attention having been drawn towards it by a mention of its having been republished. I have a copy of the first edition, Ertz being one of the early C20th middlebrow women novelists in whom I have had an interest going back decades, but not sure whether I ever actually read this. It is sf Of The Period, in which someone is cast forward into The Future by sciento-psychic means, this is his account. And okay, is not (unlike a cluster from around the same time) about the dystopic crushing iron heel of fascistic misogyny, is about the dysoptic outcome of a war in which germ warfare has killed all the women. Except one who has survived courtesy of mad scientist neighbour's experimental process.
Points for her being a young women of education, character, and something of a backstory conveying a certain cynicism, but she still concedes to the agenda of marrying and going forth and having babbyz, though I think everyone is a bit optimistic that she will pop out multiple daughters and even so, we do not think this will Save Humanity. (Also, no-one seems to suggest she should have Plurality of Mates, surely that would be advisable?) But then it just stops with our narrator pinging back to his present day.
Most recent Literary Review
Muriel Spark, A Far Cry from Kensington (1988), which I really enjoyed and am now looking out for more of hers - think I have copies of some somewhere?
Robert Barnard, Death of a Literary Widow (1979)- everybody in it is a bit of a caricature, not just the American academic.
Emily Tesh, The Incandescent (2025), because I have been hearing well of it. Pretty good, but is it just having Read A Lot that made one character look like a honking parade of red flags?
On the go
I think I am actually giving up on I Am A Woman, I don't think Being A Sad Lesbian is enough to provide a rounded character? Maybe it gets better?
Nibbling at various things. Realise that it is 2 weeks to next Pilgrimage discussion and I do not want to read Honeycomb too far in advance.
Up next
No idea.