I suspect it might be abit similar to me discovering statistics and what a wonderful thing it is:) But, as to 14 cases, I'll quote Wiki:"...Typologically, Estonian represents a transitional form from an agglutinating language to an inflected language. Over the course of Estonian history, German has exercised a strong influence on Estonian, both in vocabulary and syntax.
In Estonian nouns and pronouns do not have grammatical gender, but nouns and adjectives decline in fourteen cases: nominative, genitive, partitive, illative, inessive, elative, allative, adessive, ablative, translative, terminative, essive, abessive, and comitative, with the case and number of the adjective(s) always agreeing with that of the noun (except in the terminative, essive, abessive and comitative, where there is agreement only for the number, the adjective being in the genitive form). Thus the illative for "a yellow house" (kollane maja) — "into a yellow house" is (kollasesse majja).
The direct object of the verb appears either in the accusative (for total objects) or in the partitive (for partial objects). The accusative coincides with the genitive in the singular and with nominative in the plural. Accusative vs. partitive case opposition of object used with transitive verbs creates a telicity contrast, just as in Finnish. This is a rough equivalent of the perfect vs. imperfect aspect opposition.
The verbal system lacks a distinctive future tense (the present tense serves here) and features special forms to express an action performed by an undetermined subject (the "impersonal")...."
Apparently, when Methos was young, we had only 7 cases. Can't imagine wehre we went wrong in the meantime *sigh*. Of course, Finnish has either 15 or 16 cases (I forget which is correct), so they've screwed up even more *grin*.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-12 02:29 pm (UTC)But, as to 14 cases, I'll quote Wiki:"...Typologically, Estonian represents a transitional form from an agglutinating language to an inflected language. Over the course of Estonian history, German has exercised a strong influence on Estonian, both in vocabulary and syntax.
In Estonian nouns and pronouns do not have grammatical gender, but nouns and adjectives decline in fourteen cases: nominative, genitive, partitive, illative, inessive, elative, allative, adessive, ablative, translative, terminative, essive, abessive, and comitative, with the case and number of the adjective(s) always agreeing with that of the noun (except in the terminative, essive, abessive and comitative, where there is agreement only for the number, the adjective being in the genitive form). Thus the illative for "a yellow house" (kollane maja) — "into a yellow house" is (kollasesse majja).
The direct object of the verb appears either in the accusative (for total objects) or in the partitive (for partial objects). The accusative coincides with the genitive in the singular and with nominative in the plural. Accusative vs. partitive case opposition of object used with transitive verbs creates a telicity contrast, just as in Finnish. This is a rough equivalent of the perfect vs. imperfect aspect opposition.
The verbal system lacks a distinctive future tense (the present tense serves here) and features special forms to express an action performed by an undetermined subject (the "impersonal")...."
Apparently, when Methos was young, we had only 7 cases. Can't imagine wehre we went wrong in the meantime *sigh*. Of course, Finnish has either 15 or 16 cases (I forget which is correct), so they've screwed up even more *grin*.
Also, if you're interested, some links:
http://www.ecml.at/html/estonian/html/8online_resources.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estonian_language
http://www.alphadictionary.com/directory/Languages/Uralic/Estonian/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uralic_languages
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_language
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Finno-Ugric
http://virtual.finland.fi/netcomm/news/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=25832